A study has been made of the rate at which single-crystal germanium is etched under various conditions. For simplicity, the principal etchants used were composed of only H~O2, HF, and water. Data are given for the rate as a function of temperature and composition of the etchant, and as a function of the orientation and impurity content of the crystal. An equation which assumes two reactions taking place in sequence on the surface fits the rate vs. temperature data within the limits of experimental error. In the range studied, the rate-controlling processes are sensitive to sample orientation. From etching data, a value was obtained for the thickness of the disturbed surface layer due to abrasive grinding. This was found to be in the range of 2-10 ~ and to depend on sample orientation and abrasive particle size. Comparative data are given for two common etchants of a more complicated composition.
INTRODUCTION
For several years, the treatment of germanium by etching has played an important role in the production of germanium devices and in the preparation of samples for research purposes. In the last two years, such treatment has become an increasingly important tool for investigating the orientation and quality of germanium samples, different treatments revealing different properties of the material. But the treatments themselves have not been well understood. In the hope of progressing toward an understanding of these processes, a study has been made of the etching rate of germanium crystals under various conditions. For simplicity, most of the work has been confined to etchants containing only HF, H202, and water. In order to insure sample uniformity, all samples were cut from one large single crystal of As-doped, n-type germanium. Since the resistivity of the crystal varied slowly along its length, resistivities between 1 and 9 ohm-cm could be obtained by selecting samples from the proper region of the crystal. The samples were thin, usually of the order of 30 mils thickness, so that the ratio of face area to edge area was large. The error introduced by including the edge area as if it were of the same orientation as the face was less than 2%. The samples were held with polyethylene-coated tweezers and the area of contact was small enough to be neglected. Etching rates were obtained by measuring the loss of weight of a sample after a known etching time. Weights were measured to 0.2 mg and the weight differences were usually of the order of 20 mg. Considerable attention was given to the freshness and composition of the etchants and to the surface preparation of the samples. In order that the circulation of the etching solution should not influence the results, all experiments were performed under conditions of agitation sufficiently violent that substantial changes in agitation made no difference in the etching rate.
GENERAL PRECAUTIONS Since little was known about the effects of various parameters on the etching rate, much effort was devoted to insuring that only the parameter under investigation was influencing the results. This was done either by comparison of samples differing in only one respect, or by direct experiment to determine what parameters could be ignored safely. Temperature.--The temperature was maintained constant by immersing the etching vessel in a constant temperature bath. The volume of etchant used, about 60 cc, was large compared to the volume of the samples. The temperature of the etchant was measured directly to =t=0.3~ by means of a polyethylene-coated thermometer. Resistivity.--The samples used were kept short so that the variation in resistivity along the length was less than 4-5 % from the mean except for the 1 ohm-cm sample. Insofar as possible, samples were compared which were cut from the same depth in the crystal. All samples were labeled to show from what part of the crystal they came. Thus, the notation 4(100)3-2 means that the sample was from the fourth resistivity region of the crystal, a (100) cut, and the third slab from the surface. This sample was then cut into smaller pieces, the -2 indicating the second such piece.
Etch composition.--Etehes were made up fresh each day in batches large enough that the composition was measured with an accuracy greater than the assay of the reagents used. Most work was done with the simplest etch (1 HF, 1 H202, 4H20), called the No. 2 etch (see appendix for etch compositions). The variation in the concentration of the reagent H202 used (5 parts in 30) was sufficient to introduce a rate error of about 4-4%. However, in most experiments, the same reagent was used. Therefore, although the absolute values may have been affected, the accuracy of the comparisons was determined by other factors.
Faust (1) reported that the presence of poly-ethylene in contact with the HF-H202 etch increases the reaction rate. Both the reagent HF and H202 in the present study were stored, prior to use, in polyethylene bottles. To determine stability, a stock solution of No. 2 etchant was kept in a poly-ethylene bottle for an additional six weeks; the rate measured at the end of this period was the same as that measured at the start. This indicates that etching solutions may actually be made up in large quantities and used over a considerable period of time.
Weighing.--Etching rates were obtained by measuring the loss of weight of the sample during a measured time of etching. Weights were measured to • mg. Weight differences were usually of the order of 20 mg.
Agitation.--In order to make certain that the rate of agitation used did not influence the results, a set of measurements was made of the weight loss of a sample etched under different conditions of agitation. This experiment was done at 40~ a temperature at which the rate of etching was known to be high. The curve is shown in Fig. 1. One agitation is a movement to and fro of 1 in. in a 60-ce beaker containing 40 cc of solution, and it is seen that one or two agitations per second are enough to stabilize the etching rate.
上一篇: 锑化铟和锑化镓晶体的生长和表征
下一篇: 硅微加工的HF溶液中的电化学刻蚀