湿法化学处理对锗晶片表面影响的研究

时间:2023-01-30 15:36:44 浏览量:0

Introduction

Due to its excellent low field mobility [1], germanium has recently re-emerged as an alternative to silicon for high performance devices. As for silicon, appropriate wet chemical treatment of the germanium wafer surface is of the utmost importance for final device yield and reliability. Wet chemical processes need to be developed for germanium cleaning and for surface preparation for subsequent growth processes, e.g. epitaxial growth (an oxide free germanium surface) or for Atomic Layer Deposition (a hydroxyl terminated germanium surface), … In this work, the chemical change of the germanium wafer surface under influence of various wet chemistries is investigated. Surface preparation methods are proposed for both epitaxial growth and for Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) on germanium.


Experimental

Cz grown p-type <100> germanium wafer pieces were dipped in various chemicals (NH4OH, HF,HCl, HBr, H2O2, …) and subsequently N2-blow dried. Dip time was always 5 minutes unless other wise specified. The samples were stored in a N2-ambient until further analysis. XPS spectra were recorded using a SSX100 equipped with an AlKα anode. The peaks were mixed Lorentzian-Gaussian fitted with a linear or Shirley background. Oxide thickness values were obtained using the Thickogram method [2], which is based on the Hill-equation [3].For etch rate measurements a Scaltec SBC31 balance was used. Etch rates were calculated using ER = 2∆m ρπd 2 ∆t , or by fitting the weight loss vs. dip time curve.


Material Properties

Silicon and germanium are both group IV elements with comparable physical properties although distinct differences exist. Table I summarizes the most relevant ones. Both silicon and germanium form native oxides, which show catenation, but the absence of germanium analogues of silicone polymers speaks for the lower stability of the Ge-O-Ge linkage [4]. In addition, the hexagonal form of GeO2 is water soluble (5.2 g/l) [5]. Furthermore, there is a trend towards increasing stability of MII rather than MIV compounds in the sequence Si, Ge, Sn, Pb [4].

Table I: A comparison of some important material properties for silicon and germanium.

微信截图_20230130153641


微信截图_20230130153725

Figure 1: The various types of contaminants possibly present on a germanium wafer surface.


Etching and oxidizing of the germanium wafer

As for any surface, a number of unwanted deposits might be present, as shown in Figure 1. Organic contamination is commonly removed using oxidative chemistries. Particles and metals are generally removed using a combination of oxidation and etching possibly complemented by chelating agents, surfactants and physical action, like megasonic irradiation. In the following paragraphs we will have a look at the effect of frequently used silicon cleaning chemistries on the germanium wafer surface.


Germanium and oxidative chemistries. A germanium wafer is, like a silicon wafer almost always covered by a native oxide, as supported by the XPS spectrum shown in Figure 2, where a large GeO2 peak is observed (BOX). Upon dipping a germanium wafer in water the GeO2 is removed. Figure 2 (H2O) shows only a small shoulder on the elemental germanium peak, indicating the presence of a mere suboxide (GeOx, x<2). This proves that the native oxide is predominantly consisting of the water soluble hexagonal GeO2. The underlying suboxide is not removed. Therefore, it is evident that any aqueous oxidative treatment able to oxidize GeOx to GeO2 will etch the substrate as illustrated in Table II. Oxygen (bubbled in water at room temperature), however, seems not to be powerful enough to further oxidize the GeOx. This is also reflected in Figure 3, where no GeO2 peak is observed for this treatment.


文件下载请联系管理员: 400-876-8096